Seems like a serious view of fanon review is missing in this Wiki: Although there have been calls for more peer reviews even by the admins as well as a fanon review section in the newspaper, fanon reviews are lacking to say the least. As such I shall take the opportunity to do a review of my own, maybe that might bring in some new opportunities.

Anyhow, The comment section has been a good thing generally, although from what I see it tends to inflate newer fanons and it does more to encourage writers rather than actually put meaningful inputs. I shall prefer to review submitted fanons rather than picking on random fanons as not to offend users, however. MILK FOR THE UNYUUFEX, FLAT CHEST FOR THE CUTENESS THRONE, SKULLS FOR THE SKULL PROBES (user talk:Mathetesalexandrou) 23:16, April 2, 2012 (UTC)